2015-09-16

Gaṇeśa Caturthī 2015


Today is Gaeśa Caturthī, a day associated with the worship of Gaeśa. The elephant-headed deity has become loved by many all over the world. He’s big, friendly, sometimes clumsy and he helps us when we are stuck- who wouldn’t love him. Gaeśa is also associated with technology, which includes our computers. These beneficial devices can cause us great headaches when they get bugs, viruses or just plain don’t do what they are supposed to be doing. In the ancient days, Gaeśa was associated with small machines, and as we see with the Antikythera mechanism, small machines have been around for a long time. Today, Gaeśa is the god of the computer, and just as every image of Gaeśa is not complete without a mouse sitting next to him, so our computers are not complete without a mouse.  

Gaṇeśa is one of the best deities to have an image of in the office. I even keep a small sticker on my computer. Gaṇeśa is also a very important energy for learning, and anyone is school will benefit from his presence. By nature, Gaṇeśa is a mathematical genius, and thinks like a quantum physicist. He particularly looks over those in the realm of technology, and the technical sciences. Gaṇeśa also represents the doorway, the beginning, or the access to something new. He can be symbolized by a key, as he is the key that opens the lock that gets us through.  

As the Gaeśa has become famous enough to have his image in homes and store fronts around the world, what form is best? There are so many different types of Gaeśa. Here, I want to share an astrological technique to look at which position of Gaeśa is the most appropriate for an individual to approach him.

The twelve houses are divided into the four aims of life. The dharma houses (fire) indicate a standing form, the artha houses (earth) indicate a sitting/riding form, the kama houses (air) indicate an active form (walking or dancing) and the moka houses (water) indicate a resting form. From this we understand that a standing form helps us realize purpose and therefore removes the blocks to achieving our goals. A sitting or riding form is beneficial for wealth and prosperity. A dancing form is good for all levels of relationship (friendships and love). And the form of the resting Gaeśa is calling us to reside within our true nature, thereby removing spiritual blocks.   
  
Manilius, in the Greek text Astronomica, mentions the position of the twelve signs based on their astronomical layout in the sky. He says, “Nor must you imagine that Nature has wrought a design of no purpose in that certain signs are running, as are the Lion, the Archer, and the Ram that ends in twisted horns; or that some stand erect with their limbs perfectly poised, the Virgin and Twins and Waterman pouring forth his stream; or that some sit fatigued and reflect their weariness of mind, the Bull slumberous now the plough has left his shoulder, the Balance that sinks down after discharging its round of tasks, and you, Capricorn, whose limbs are shrivelled by the frost; or that some lie flat, the Crab sprawling with distended belly, the Scorpion reposing on the ground beneath its smooth breast, the Fishes swimming sideways, for ever horizontal.” (2.244-256)  These sign positions match the house positions utilized in the Vedic determination of the deity position.   

In the Utkal tradition, we take the house location of Ketu (the south node) and utilize this position for Gaeśa. This indicates one’s root form of Gaeśa. So if an individual has Ketu in the first, fifth, or ninth house, then a standing form is best. If Ketu is in the second, sixth, or tenth house then a form of him sitting or riding is the best. If Ketu is placed in the third, seventh or eleventh house then a dancing Gaeśa is best. If Ketu is in the fourth, eighth or twelfth house then a reclining Gaeśa is best. In general, a sitting (artha) form of Gaṇeśa is best for the office, and a standing form (dharma) will be best for a yoga studio or school.     

Au hrīṁ jyotir-gaeṣāya nama





G.P. Goold, Manilius Astronomica (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977) pp 101-103. 



No comments:

Post a Comment